Thanks for all the reviews you're making, there are really useful. It may only be about 5% faster overall than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, but that still makes it solidly the fastest CPU we have ever tested for Lightroom Classic. One thing we do want to note is that the pre-launch BIOS that is available for Ryzen motherboards is using AGESA 1.0.8. But 9960x is suddenly much worse with smart previews in comparison to your October-Benchmark. This effectively puts AMD in the lead over Intel no matter what your budget is and what parts of Lightroom Classic you want to optimize for. Lightroom is hard to benchmark since the things that are easiest to test (importing, exporting, generating previews, etc.) In the past, there were arguments for using an Intel processor for Lightroom Classic if you wanted to optimize for active tasks like scrolling through images, but with the new Ryzen 5000 Series CPUs, AMD takes a solid lead no matter the task. I actually had been considering the 9900 prior to the 3900x, but the link in my OP is to some benchmarks specifically related to Lightroom performance, and the 3900x has about a 25-30% gains over the Intel counterparts. When using nvidia FPS counter my rysen system peaks to 3-4fps while my intel system goes up to 20-30fps while regulating the sliders. so great that you did the test with the new 9.0 version! In order to see how each of these configurations performs in Lightroom Classic, we will be using our PugetBench for Lightroom Classic V0.92 benchmark and Lightroom Classic version 10.0. Its a strong alternative to lightroom and it has better performance, but I can´t seem to find how it responds to different hardwareGreat article BTW :D. Capture One is on our list, but it honestly will likely be at least a year or longer before we are able to take it on - we have a few other major project to take on first. Noch interessanter wird Platz 2! It's actually slower on the new setup, and I see many people complaining about Lightroom's bad performance on CPUs with more than four cores. In this article, we will be examining the performance of the new AMD Ryzen 5600X, 5800X, 5900X, and 5950X in Lightroom Classic compared to a range of CPUs including the Intel 10th Gen, Intel X-10000 Series, AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, and the previous generation AMD Ryzen 3000-series processors. Thanks for the read! So for A7R3 42Mp .ARW files , is the 9900k better than 3900x ? A faster export is certainly welcome. Calibrating the monitors had no impact as expected, Datacolor Spyder 5 Pro. Takt und IPC zählen. Example for dragging the Noise Reduction Luminance slider, Fuji X-T1 RAW image: from almost real time to 3 seconds. Another factor that has changed recently is that the Gigabyte B550 Vision D motherboard - with fully certified Thunderbolt support - has launched and passed our internal qualification process. Our Lightroom Classic benchmark tests a wide range of tasks that are divided between "active" tasks (scrolling through images, brush lag, etc.) The devs have also been putting a ton of work into improving many aspects of LrC that we haven't figured out a good way to test like brush/slider lag and things like that. Ideally, I would love to have both, as well as if the CPU and GPU are overclocked or not. Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. Also, waiting for the LR benchmark. With that being said, this is going to be a new build for me, and I plan on using it for gaming + my wife will be using it for photo editing (lightroom and some basic photoshop.) Multi displays can make it really hard to tell what the actual screen resolution is if there are different display resolutions in use, as does different DPI settings. This limits the Ryzen platform to 64GB of RAM while the other platforms had 128GB, but since our Lightroom Classic benchmark never needs more than 32GB of RAM to run, this does not affect performance at all. Puget Systems Lightroom and Photoshop Benchmarks Before we tell photographers if AMD or Intel runs Lightroom and Photoshop better, it is important to know why it is Matt Bach from Puget Systems is so qualified to speak to the topic. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also like to provide the individual results for you to examine. Listed below are the specifications of the systems we will be using for our testing: *All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of October 26, 2020. I would guess maybe in 2-3 weeks we can have a version for Windows up for download. We actually just put a post up about why we are shifting to DDR4-3200 RAM on (most) of our systems: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance Hier haste einen Vergleich. Comparing applications is something we don't really try to do since there is so much more to why you would use one application over another than straight performance. Iknow, i know, it's a little bit malicious :-). When AMD released the first of their 3rd generation Ryzen processors back in July 2019, they were quickly established as the fastest processors for Adobe Lightroom Classic. Overall, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is currently the fastest CPU we have tested for Lightroom Classic, but the extra 5% performance over the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X for a 50% increase in cost is likely to be hard to justify for most users. Er schafft den Test in 119 Sekunden und kostet gerade mal 370 Euro.. Der Intel Core i7-8700K kostet ähnlich wenig, braucht aber für den Parcours 195 Sekunden.. Ist sieht also so aus, als ob ein aktueller AMD Ryzen Prozessor eine sehr gute und preisgünstige Wahl für Lightroom ist. Posted by 1 year ago. In fact, this is the speed we are planning on using in our Ryzen workstations once JDEC DDR4-2933 16GB sticks are available. Maybe you should setup a databases system where people could upload their results to compare with others. Please add the Quadro RTX 4000 to your GPU test. The average of 87.7 and 96.5 is 92.1, which x10 is 921. I haven't seen any benchmarks on the Ryzen CPUs, don't go by the hype, find some benchmarks. Hence the attraction of a single slot card. It is also worth noting that the 5800X and 5900X outperformed the 10900K not only in the passive tasks but the active ones as well, which was where Intel was previously maintaining a slight edge. It also gets a bit hairy for us since we are partners with many of these companies, and very few of them seem to welcome head-to-head comparisons. As has been stated in the benchmarks that the video card, above a minimum level, doesn't much impact Lightroom performance (except for the Texture slider); if I upgrade from the K1200 to the RTX 4000 vs the GTX 2080 Ti, am I going to see equivalent performance with the RTX 4000? Definitely enough to skew results, which is why our own internal testing with locked down configurations is always going to be more reliable than publicly uploaded results. In this article, we want to see whether the increase in core count (and price) is worth it for Adobe Lightroom Classic. Hey! The K1200 is a pretty old GPU, so you should notice some difference with the newer versions of Lightroom Classic where they have been improving GPU acceleration support. How is the performance? AMD hasn't added any more cores to their new line of processors, but among other things, they are touting a 19% IPC (instructions per clock) improvement. I'm sure the hardware itself has an impact as well. I was wondering if you had performed any testing using this faster memory, and whether further big gains were achievable for a modest investment. So it would be really exciting to compare the new CPUs to a Core i7-4700K or Core i7-7700K. Is anyone out there using Lightroom with i9 or Ryzen CPUs? AMD has had a strong lead in Lightroom Classic for passive tasks like exporting, but Intel managed to maintain a small advantage for active tasks like scrolling through images and switching between modules. Why?• Video Card: Is it really meaningful to use a graphics card that would normally not be installed in a Lightroom computer (RTX 2080 Ti)? Even with all the improvements Adobe has done in the last couple of Lightroom versions to take advantage of the GPU, it is still primarily a CPU-driven application. As for the future, only the developers could tell you.4) No way to really know. Yep, you are right on the average thing, the only thing you missed was that we multiple the average by 10 because a bigger number means it is more important. With that really quick look at workstation performance out-of-the-way, we can move onto a look at gaming performance – aka: the true reason for this article’s existence today. If you want more information on the specs of this new processor, we recommend checking out our New CPU Announcement: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X post. A Quadro RTX4000 is going to perform about on par with a RTX 2060 Super or RTX 2070. You are of course free to do whatever you want with your own system, but we've always taken the stance that reliability is more important than getting a bit more performance since in a production environment, system crashes and lost work costs far more money than losing a few percent performance. We've tried to work with the devs to add the functionality we need, but it can be hard to find time to add features that help us when they are busy tackling bugs and adding features that are useful for their end users. I really wouldn't advise going above 3200MHz though. If your workflow includes other software packages, you need to consider how the processor will perform in all those applications. Eine kleine Benchmark Orgie meines neuen Ryzen 2700er Computers. Can you please explain this? Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. I’ve narrowed it down to 2 top contenders, the TR 3960X and the Zen 5900X. 9.2 is at least 4 times slower than the last V8 release. Hello AMD! There is almost no reason to use the X-series when the Core i9 10900K is both less expensive and faster, so the true performance lead with the AMD Ryzen 5000-series peaks out closer to only 20%. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also wanted to provide the individual results. Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. That reference score is completely static and won't ever change until we add tests to our benchmark that forces us to re-create it. At a glance then it would appear that all of the systems reviewed here are notably slower than that old 9900k test rig - which is clearly incorrect. Benchmark. The reason we use a 2080Ti in our CPU-based testing is simply to make sure that the GPU is not a bottleneck. The 8-core Xeon will fit but considering how much slower it is, not sure that would be an upgrade. With this motherboard, Thunderbolt support is no longer as much of a factor when choosing between Intel 10th Gen and AMD Ryzen CPUs in our workstations. And hold that thought on the upload thing - that is a project we are hoping to get to next year. I am stoked for the release of the Ryzen 5000 chips. That is definitely something I want to look at! The Quadro line is mostly about having high amounts of VRAM which almost never a problem for photography applications. If you are concerned about general Lightroom performance, the Intel Core i7 7700K is significantly faster for most tasks and only ~10% slower when exporting images. I'm currently building a desktop machine for editing in Lightroom Classic based on an AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, 12x 3.80GHz. I haven't tried exporting with SMT off, but I have turned off SMT when editing and it runs so much smoother. It does seem that Lightroom Classic in particular is memory speed sensitive and could benefit from faster RAM. Not sure there is anything meaningfully faster that will go into the current CPU socket. Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Lightroom Classic. Since this testing was completed, Premiere Pro 14.2 released with some huge GPU performance improvements. Thanks for the reply. 9.1's biggest reduction was undo (Ctrl-Z), now with 9.2, applying the slider is as slow as undo. Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. With the launch of AMD's new Ryzen 5000-series processors, however, it is very likely that AMD will be able to take a very solid lead over Intel in Lightroom Classic no matter what task you are looking at. Putting a dual slot video card right next to the HP Z Turbo Drive would likely create heat issues as Hard Disk Sentinel says it's the hottest running drive in my machine. Since the 5600x isn't out yet, there's no testing to indicate if it's supposed faster single core speed will help improve performance in Lightroom over a CPU like the 3700x, which is around the same price but has 2 more cores/4 more threads. It’s the Mac Pro that’s *REALLY* bad. I think above a small GPU upgrade, you are going to be bottlenecked by your CPU. Lightroom catalog is essentially a database that contains all imported … This processor features a staggering 16 CPU cores which is really starting to blur the line between "consumer" and "HEDT" (High End Desktop) processors. For years, neither Intel nor AMD have done anything to really justify an upgrade. Comparing the 5600X to the more similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K, the 5600X is a decent 11% faster in our Lightroom Classic benchmark. (assuming that the 10700k in these results is on par with that old 9900k). Same with the new Ryzen - as far as I know, AMD hasn't made an official announcement, so no way to know for sure. So overall, performance is not better with HT enabled than with it disabled, which is why we didn't disable it for this testing. There could be merit to using only the CPU for encoding, but while that was once de facto, the performance improvements a GPU can bring can make a huge difference. Screen resolution is easier, but it also more complicated than it sounds. At a recent event, Intel ran a comparison using Adobe Lightroom that showed better performance on a Tiger Lake i7-118G7 machine versus one equipped with a Ryzen 4800U. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. In theory, this could translate to almost a 20% performance increase over the previous generation, although it will likely heavily depend on the application. 2) Should I expect my PC to continue to lock up with either of these CPU’s? Here’s my thought and I’ll try not to ramble. Close. I'm having a blast editing 4K content in Premiere, but Lightroom? 4-core CPUs are becoming hard to find (but not yet impossible), and I would certainly like to upgrade my computer to take advantage of the i9 or Ryzen power in all my … They do have a 10-20% higher price tag as well, although in terms of absolute cost that works out to only a $50 increase which is fairly small if you look at it as a part of the overall cost of a computer. I used to run this task, go out for lunch, return home and listen to music for a few hours before it finished. No, SMT (and HT on Intel) is on. Comparing the 5600X to the more similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K, the 5600X is a decent 11% faster in our Lightroom Classic benchmark. CL timings are really hard (impossible from what I have found so far) to get directly at the level we have access to through the various Adobe APIs. Is there any chance you might add capture one to the software you benchmark in the future? The $/performance looks amazing for a Ryzen 3900 powered Lightroom workstation. Yet, if i take a look on the scores of the 9900k it's 921 (87.7 active + 96.5 passive). The second thing to note is that we are using our soon to be released Lightroom Classic Benchmark. Currently, we have articles for Photoshop, Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve, and a number of other applications. When I bought the 3900X I immediately noticed the huge difference when exporting images. Yep, it looks like performance has gotten worse for the active tasks we are testing since we first made the reference scores. We saw some odd performance issues with the Ryzen 9 5950X, but the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 5900X beat the Intel Core i9 10900K by a solid 14% and 21% respectively, while the Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K by a bit smaller 11%. And as knowledgeable as we are about workflows, we are likely never to be as good as the people who are deep in these apps every day using them to make a living. It probably isn't just Lightroom though, Windows updates and drivers also have an impact on performance - and sometimes not in a good way. One of the first things is to get our Lightroom Classic benchmark up for public download. Ryzen 3000 series Lightroom performance? Between a Quadro RTX 4000 and RTX 2080 Ti, however, you likely won't notice much of a difference. The Ryzen 7 3700X is the next step up from the Ryzen 5 3600X in terms of performance and price. On my system, for the Develop sliders (the only performance characteristic I care about as I spend 90+% of my Lightroom time dragging sliders), V9.1 was a slowdown and 9.2 a huge slowdown. Could you make the benchmark downloadble to execute yourself? It shouldn't affect performance much, but good benchmarking is about removing variables to try to get the most accurate results as possible. Soon after launch, there should be an update that adds support for AGESA 1.1.0 which is supposed to increase the performance of each Ryzen CPU by another few percent. After all that, we can try to track RAM timing, screen resolution, overclocking, and a number of other aspects of the system information. First things first: Thank you for the lightning fast testing of the new 3950X!However, it is very difficult to draw meaningful conclusions without a closer look at your numbers:• You seem to have tested Intel with HT-on. great job again with yours online database, but! Display resolution I don't have an article to back it up (yet), but from what I've seen the difference is at most 5-10%. Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. Thank you for such a competent and detailed reply. Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. Is the correct interpretation then that Lightroom has become ~13% slower between versions 8.4 and 10.0 in the 'active' test? As far as performance relative to older systems, that is something we've done in the past and want to do more of - we just don't have the bandwidth to do that in addition to keeping up with the latest hardware and software updates.